It’s odd …

A) How someone is still, 20 years …
B) How someone is still, 2000 years …

A) … after the General Synod’s democratic decision …
B) … after the common history of the Church arising from the Bible …

A) … knowing that the nation may abandon the church …
B) … knowing that the Lord Himself may abandon the church …

A) … and the church may lose the blessing of the governing authorities …
B) … and the church may lose the blessing of God …

A) … and what will then happen to the church’s finances and future …
B) … and what will then happen to the church’s finances and future …

A) … when all this opposing is based only on an interpretation of the Bible …
B) … when all this opposing is based only on an interpretation of the Bible …

A) … which is supported by a small minority in the church …
B) … which is supported by a small minority in Christendom and its history …

A) … can still think like that and then obstinately make life difficult for others …
B) … can still think like that and then obstinately make life difficult for others …

A) … when it would be easier and more honest to leave the church and start another …
B) … when it would be easier and more honest to leave the church and start another …

A) … so it’s really odd why they don’t draw the right conclusions.
B) … so it’s really odd why they don’t draw the right conclusions.

Translated from http://www.luthersaatio.fi/uutiset/kummallista-perspektiiveja-kirkolliseen-debattiin.html

Advertisements